<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beyond Volkswagen: The Future Of Hamilton County</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chattanoogapulse.com/newsfeatures/news-feature/beyond-volkswagen-the-future-of-hamilton-county/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chattanoogapulse.com/newsfeatures/news-feature/beyond-volkswagen-the-future-of-hamilton-county/</link>
	<description>Chattanooga&#039;s Alternative Weekly Newspaper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:26:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Lohr</title>
		<link>http://chattanoogapulse.com/newsfeatures/news-feature/beyond-volkswagen-the-future-of-hamilton-county/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Lohr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chattanoogapulse.com/?p=3010#comment-100</guid>
		<description>9 water districts is bad?  I seem to recall that when Mayor Kinsey was trying to grab Tennessee-American, one of the 9 districts sold water  for about half what the rest charged.   If that&#039;s still true, and sustainable, and I lived there, I&#039;d oppose consolidation.  For the sake of those who do live there, I oppose it now.  If I lived next door to that district, I&#039;d like to unhook from my district and hook onto the cheap one.  Legalize competition!  If it ends up consolidated, fine, as long as competition remains legal.  &lt;br&gt;  Far too often, the government creates and enforces a monopoly, enriching the monopolizers at the expense of everyone else.  It probably made sense to give Tennessee-American a 99-year monopoly so T-A would build a water system for Chattanooga, but the 99 years are up.  Make T-A face reality, i.e. competition.   Stop shielding their profits; make them earn them (and let them earn them).  Stop shielding lawyers&#039; fees; make lawyers compete with their secretaries, who do a lot of the work.   And so on--the Institute for Justice (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ij.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.ij.org&lt;/a&gt;) agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9 water districts is bad?  I seem to recall that when Mayor Kinsey was trying to grab Tennessee-American, one of the 9 districts sold water  for about half what the rest charged.   If that&#39;s still true, and sustainable, and I lived there, I&#39;d oppose consolidation.  For the sake of those who do live there, I oppose it now.  If I lived next door to that district, I&#39;d like to unhook from my district and hook onto the cheap one.  Legalize competition!  If it ends up consolidated, fine, as long as competition remains legal.  <br />  Far too often, the government creates and enforces a monopoly, enriching the monopolizers at the expense of everyone else.  It probably made sense to give Tennessee-American a 99-year monopoly so T-A would build a water system for Chattanooga, but the 99 years are up.  Make T-A face reality, i.e. competition.   Stop shielding their profits; make them earn them (and let them earn them).  Stop shielding lawyers&#39; fees; make lawyers compete with their secretaries, who do a lot of the work.   And so on&#8211;the Institute for Justice (<a href="http://www.ij.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.ij.org</a>) agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
